Anti Trump 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Rules AGAIN Against Travel Ban

9th circuit blocks travel ban again

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which is clearly anti Trump, ruled for the third time on Friday against the POTUS travel ban, thus blocking most of the executive order’s provisions, arguing that President Trump exceeded his powers. The 9th Circus ruled that, let me quote:

visitors from six majority-Muslim countries can still travel to the U.S. despite the policy, as long as they have a preexisting relationship with an American person or entity.

The latest ruling of the 9th Circus argues that the President’s executive orders are causing poor immigrants  “psychological harm and distress”, as Muslims feel targeted and made to live in fear.

The activist judges in the 9th “circus” are ignoring the Supreme Court’s precedent:

Knauff v. Shaughnessy ,38 U.S. 537 (1950)

“(c) It is not within the province of any court, unless expressly authorized by law, to review the determination of the political branch of Government to exclude a given alien.”

So, in other words: these three (not elected) “judges” (not accountable to the people) are proclaiming that they are the ultimate/final decision makers for this country (i.e. calling the shots) ,which is clearly wrong headed (and arrogant and arguably treasonous) in this writer’s opinion. Talk about (the outrageous) usurping of power, this is as good as it gets, pun intended. These judges are abusing their positions for political purposes and they need to be thrown out of office.

Liberal activist judges have become a serious threat to our sovereignty. President Trump needs to dismantle the entire 9th circuit court, as President Jefferson did with 17 federal courts in his time.

Let me be very clear: I don’t call it the 9th CIRCUS for nothing. They are overturned upwards of 80% of the time. Their opinions and rulings are short lived once put in the hands of REAL JUDGES.

If you can not see the danger in allowing free migration from countries that are only countries in the loosest sense of the word, than you are either willfully blind or mentally incompetent.
Not to mention the danger of allowing bureaucrats appointed for life to determine national policy.
You may be willing to allow your throat to be slit on the altar of political correctness, but you are not permitted to insist everyone place their head on the block. Here’s something interesting:

Knauff v. Shaughnessy ,38 U.S. 537 (1950)
(a) The admission of aliens to this country is not a right, but a privilege, which is granted only upon such terms as the United States prescribes. P. 338 U. S. 542.

(c) It is not within the province of any court, unless expressly authorized by law, to review the determination of the political branch of Government to exclude a given alien.

(d) Any procedure authorized by Congress for the exclusion of aliens is due process, so far as an alien denied entry is concerned. P. 338 U. S. 544.

Take particular notice of (c).

The courts had no jurisdiction.

MR. JUSTICE MINTON delivered the opinion of the Court.

The exclusion of aliens is a fundamental act of sovereignty. The right to do so stems not alone from legislative power, but is inherent in the executive power to control the foreign affairs of the nation. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U. S. 304; Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U. S. 698, 149 U. S. 713. When Congress prescribes a procedure concerning the admissibility of aliens, it is not dealing alone with a legislative power. It is implementing an inherent executive power.…