The UN Warns About Potential Civil Conflict in the United States

UN warns America

The United Nations Committee assigned with combating racism globally has issued a rare “early warning” to the United States, signaling the probability of a potential civil-conflict looming, due to alarming racism trends. This ultra rare warning regarding civil conflict often precedes the potential for civil war and in the last decade, the “early warning signal” has been issued in Iraq, Burundi, Kyrgyzstan, Ivory Coast and Nigeria.

Also, it must be noted that United Nations Committee on the Eliminations of Racial Discrimination has now called on public officials and high level politicians of the US to decry, let me quote:

“racist hate speech and crimes in Charlottesville and through the country”.

According to the chairperson of United Nations committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, Anastasia Crickley respectively:

We are alarmed by the racist demonstrations, with overtly racist slogans, chants and salutes by white nationalists, neo-Nazis, and the Ku Klux Klan, promoting white supremacy and inciting racial discrimination and hatred

While UN News Centre: stated:

In a decision issued under its ‘early warning and urgent action’ procedure, the Committee, which monitors implementation of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, stated “there should be no place in the world for racist white supremacist ideas or any similar ideologies that reject the core human rights principles of human dignity and equality.”

 

In addition to the criminal investigation of the individual who ploughed his car into a crowd of peaceful protestors killing a woman, the UN experts asked the US authorities to undertake concrete measures “to address the root causes of the proliferation of such racist manifestations.”

Now, consider this excerpt from the Op-EdAre we headed for a second civil war? which appeared recently in the LA Times:

Not inconceivable? That’s a low bar. It’s certainly possible to imagine America returning to the violence of the 1960s and ’70s, and beneath the overwrought language, that’s what some – though not all – of these civil war prophets seem to have in mind. But a near-future war with two clear sides and Gettysburg-sized casualty counts is about as likely as a war with the moon.

 

These “new civil war” stories frequently take a bait-and-switch approach. They invoke the violence at demonstrations like the rally in Charlottesville, Va., last weekend, where a man reportedly sympathetic to Nazism drove his car into a crowd of counter-protesters, killing a woman. In the same breath, they discuss the broad divisions separating “red” America from “blue” America. If you flip quickly between small violent clashes and big political disagreements, those big disagreements will look bloodier.

It now looks pretty clear that the US is being intentionally pushed towards civil conflict and it’s purposely divided along racial lines, with the United Nations playing into the left’s hype and issuing warnings that are specific for third world countries. Hence, we should expect more violence and Charlottesville-styled events that are aimed at polarizing the American society even further. Now, here’s the cherry on top from the UN:

CERD also called on the Government to ensure that the rights to freedom of expression, association and peaceful assembly are not exercised with the aim of destroying or denying the rights and freedoms of others, and also asked it to provide the necessary guarantees so that such rights are not misused to promote racist hate speech and racist crimes.

Translated into layman’s terms, the freedom of speech can be allowed as long as it does not hurt snowflakes’ feelings.

This is the logical consequence of 8 years of Obama’s identity politics and his conscious decision to drive wedges between groups in order to meet his political and ideological goals. This is the root cause of the heightened levels of racial as well as economic tensions that we are observing today.

Obama’s presidency set back race relations at least 50 years. There is as much division today as there was in 1965. Obama is a biased individual in his views and his Marxist ideology tries to take advantage of the differences between groups of people to increase day-to-day tensions in society. He would like nothing more than to see a leftist revolution in this country. But since Obama is black, just like Black Lives Matters, you can’t find fault with him.