The War on Terror is a Fraud

war on terror

Have you ever wondered why the so called war on terror doesn’t seem to be working? If you come to think about it, you can’t wage war on a noun.  The thing is, if you don’t identify the ideology (by name) which is dressed up as a religion, an ideology that hates the west since its inception 1400 years ago, you’ll not get anywhere and you won’t be able to achieve anything.

The phrase war on terror is ridiculous, as it has zero meaning, i.e. you can’t be at war with an abstract noun no matter how hard you try and no matter how many trillions of dollars you spend. Since the source of terror is not named, and no Western politician except from Donald Trump wants to name it, you can’t do anything to eliminate the threat now, can you?

The phrase “war on terror” was coined following the 9/11 attacks to create an atmosphere of diffuse ‘threat’ that allows political forces to to keep people frightened and malleable and to make them complicit into changing democracy into martial law, police state, surveillance state and censorship.

This ABSTRACT terror threat is needed…it is upheld as an abstract danger, an intangible threat that is not meant to ever go away.

Now, the unnamed ideology comes into play. To tell you the truth, I don’t believe that Islam is at the core of this problem. We might have some serious problems with Islamic terror and jihad, whether it’s Hijrah (jihad by immigration) or terrorism (jihad by sword) or imposing sharia precepts over western societies.

But I believe that people who want to take away our freedoms need an enemy like Islamic extremism (could be any scapegoat by the way). They want to frighten us,  then to hate the scapegoat and afterwards to beg for their police state.

I am aware of the fact that Islam has been at war with the rest of the world since its inception, 1400 years ago, i.e. today’s terrorism and all that jazz is nothing new. But I want to focus on our governments and the UN, these are the globalist institutions enabling all this. They want us to focus on Islam instead of asking ourselves why our governments in the whole western world use Muslims against us.

Also,  it’s very true that many of the “westernized” Muslims are part of the problem. They are the ones who march in the street with signs that read “Islam Will Conquer the World” and “Sharia for Britain” – they WANT the world to be under Islamic domination, either through force, or by voters immigrating from Muslim lands to western lands.

But it seems to me that Muslims are being used as shock troops to create chaos and cause a great displacement of populations. The “solution” to the Muslim problem will probably be a one-world government that will propose banning religion, since they will claim religion destroys peace.

The question is….will they be able to control the Muslims once they accomplish their one-world-government purpose? Or will the weaponized Frankenstein end up defeating its master?

If you ask me, the latter is exactly what would happen IF a One-World government came about (not going to happen any time soon in this writer’s opinion)!

The NWO fanatics underestimate that Islam’s desire for a Global Caliphate is immeasurably stronger than their twisted vision of a zombie-like future for mankind. The Merkels, Junckers, Macrons, Trudeaus, et al would be defeated easily in a showdown between them and Islam in the final end game. Islam does NOT share power.

Photo Source

  • Gigi Phenomenon

    I understand what you are saying. Muslims couldn’t try to enforce their religions on western societies without the west helping them to do this. This is my point. I can understand what Muslims want. I have no understanding at all, why our governments suddenly want to help this group so much. Alas, they have an agenda. I don’t like this thought.

  • MontecristoXA

    Excellent point of you. You really nailed it. The globalists always needed an enemy to advance their agenda and control the masses.
    Sure there are some crazy fanatics in Islam. But looking at how those attacks seem to unfold, it looks more like “controlled terrorism”.
    They had all the warnings about the Manchester attacker even from Muslims themselves. They knew about him and let it happen. For what reason?