According to a high-level NOAA whistle-blower, the world leading authority with regard to climate change data published a landmark scientific paper using altered measurements in order to exaggerate the impact of global warming. So, what else is new skeptics may ask?
The whistle-blower revealed astonishing evidence for proving his claims to Britain’s Daily Mail newspaper. The latest “global warming” related scandal is moniker-ed Pausebuster by Dr. John Bates, who is a NOAA top scientist with an impeccable reputation.
Dr. John Bates presented the Daily Mail newspaper with irrefutable evidence on Sunday, revealing how scientists rushed with a landmark study based on “fake news” basically, which was published just in time for influencing the “historic” Paris Agreement 2015 on climate change.
According to the top level whistle-blower, America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration stepped over its own rules regarding scientific integrity by choosing to publish a sensationalist and flawed paper/report which was aimed at producing a big impact on world leaders (including then US President Barack Obama and David Cameron) during the United Nations climate conference from Paris two years ago.
The fake report claimed that the slowdown/pause in “global warming” observed by UN scientists between 1998 and 2013 never existed and they also lied about world temperatures rising faster than predicted by scientists. The altered NOAA report made a great impact as it was pedaled incessantly by world media and cited repeatedly by policy makers and politicians.
Dr. Bates told the Daily Mail that the respective report was never vetted by NOAA’s internal evaluation process, an internal procedure devised by Dr. Bates himself. Despite his vehement objections, the report containing faulty data was embraced by his NOAA superiors in what the whistle blower describes as a blatant attempt to intensify the impact of the Pausebuster paper.
‘They had good data from buoys. And they threw it out and “corrected” it by using the bad data from ships. You never change good data to agree with bad, but that’s what they did – so as to make it look as if the sea was warmer.
There needs to be a fundamental change to the way NOAA deals with data so that people can check and validate scientific results. I’m hoping that this will be a wake-up call to the climate science community – a signal that we have to put in place processes to make sure this kind of crap doesn’t happen again.
How ironic it is that there is now this idea that Trump is going to trash climate data, when key decisions were earlier taken by someone whose responsibility it was to maintain its integrity – and failed.
said Dr. Bates.
This new scandal is very similar to the Climategate affair in 2009, when thousands of emails were leaked, revealing how “scientists” manipulated and blocked access to data for concealing their flaws and errors in their claims about the global warming meme.
Source: Daily Mail